Summary of Citizens’ response on EIA 2020 Draft


The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change

Send emails to [email protected].in before 30th Jun 2020

Summary of Citizens’ response on EIA 2020 Draft S.O. 1199(E) published on 23rd March 2020

India ranks 177 out of 180 in the Environmental Performance Index in 2018. It is a cause of worry that we have slipped 36 places in just a matter of 2 years since 2016.

There have been more than 39 amendments and 250 office memorandums diluting the EIA 2006 Notification. Whenever a direction is passed under Section 5, it should be for the purpose of protecting the environment. Any proposed change including the above-mentioned amendments and office memorandums should have at least two basic norms:

a)       The MoEFCC should engage a committee to study the impact of the proposed change and

b)       Give a plausible explanation and background study for before changing the EIA provisions.

There is no explanation on the background of the change in the threshold of industries from Cat A to B1 or B2 OR when general conditions have been exempted.  Both these proposed amendments have clearly diluted the provisions available in EIA 2006.

For the purpose of this document, industries have been divided into red, orange, and green categories, as per the appropriate definitions accorded to them by the Central Pollution Control Board.

We, as citizens submit our request to ensure Article 21, Article 48 A and Article 51 (a)(g) of the Indian Constitution are complied with and demand absolute protection of the diverse ecosystems of our nation. Apart from objecting to 22 dilution points of EIA 2020, we propose over 30 points that need to be included to ensure EIA 2006 is strengthened for a better environmental health of our nation.

We completely oppose the below dilution points in the EIA draft published as on 23rd Mar 2020.

Sl. No.EIA Draft 2020 DilutionCitizens’ Response
1.    EIA and EMP have been separated based on industry categories.We say NO TO dilution of the EIA process based on project types. EIA and EMP should not be separated based on industry category as it is part of the EIA process in its entirety
2.    Conflict of interest of expert committee members is not taken into consideration while appointing.Ensure the constitution of EAC is made transparent. Conflict of interest to be explicitly disclosed
3.    S4(3) Pre-construction permit is blanket permission taking away social parameters from consideration.

As an example, fencing of acquired project land which also serves as village thoroughfare, grazing lands etc.
Make public consultation compulsory for all pre construction work.  The exemption from public hearing should be for extreme cases, which are duly substantiated. 
4.    Public Consultation is suggested to take only material environment concerns expressed during the processEnsure Public consultation is inclusive of socio-economic expressions of reservation and dissent.  

India’s population has increased by 19% from 116 crores in 2006 to 138 crores in 2020 and socio-economic problems have increased significantly. The high levels of pollution in many Indian cities is an example of a major health concern which affects people’s livelihoods and life.
5.    More than 25 red and orange category industries (with high toxic/negative environmental impact) can NOW be started without public consultation and EAC approval.

This list includes mining, oil exploration, river valley projects, thermal power, production of chemicals and acids, cement plants, and many more. 
The process for environment clearance for red and orange category industries MUST require public consultation and EAC approval.  

Category B2 should not include any industries in the red and orange category. Shifting the classification of industries in orange and red category to Category B2 is retrograde in law and is not in consonance with EPA 1986. (Niti Shankar Deshpande Vs UoI –  it is the duty of the Government to strengthen the law not weaken it).
6.    S (17): Allows for ex post facto clearances which is illegal as per Supreme Court order in the case related to three industrial units (Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Rohit Prajapati & Ors) – involved in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and bulk drugs at the industrial area of Ankleshwar in Gujarat that operated for several years without valid environment clearances.We say NO TO ex post facto environmental clearances which is illegal as per SC Order.
7.    Item (42) in Schedule: Hospitals generate biomedical waste and create a biohazard during a pandemic.

The proposed amendment has hospitals below 1,50,000 sq m outside the purview of EIA even inside ESA.
Mandatory public consultation in the process of environment clearance for hospitals, irrespective of proposed constructed area or size. 
8.    Item 1(a) in Schedule: Amendment allows mining below 5 hectares without EAC approval. 

This is illegal as per the judgment of SC in Deepak Kumar Vs State of Haryana. MoEF has been asked to pass directions for mandatory EAC approval irrespective of the mining lease area by 31st Dec 2018.  This has not been complied with.
EIA 2020 draft is going against SC and NGT orders in this case.

We say NO TO less than 5 Hectares mining without public consultation and EAC approval.  
9.    Item 38: The following can be done without public consultation:

a) all linear project expansion including those that need land acquisition in forests, revenue and private lands

b) expansion of the width of national highways up to 70 metres

c) road and highway expansion projects in ecologically sensitive areas or areas that are 1000 metres above mean sea level

d) Defence projects in border states
Re-install the process of public consultation for each of these. No Public hearing must be an extreme condition that is substantiated. 

To facilitate ecological & water security, check erosion and landslides, make public consultation mandatory for road and highway expansion in areas that are 500 meters above mean sea level.

Make conservation of primary, native forests the primary goal in decision making. 
10.    Item (3) in schedule: River valley projects less than 25 MW have been moved to Category B2.All river valley projects, independent of capacity, to be included in Category A. 

Mandate that, prior to the approval of such river valley projects, a cumulative EIA by an independent duly accredited body be done.  Such cumulative EIA must consider the impact of the proposed and existing projects on the river for a distance of 20 kms upstream and downstream of the proposed project site (subject to the national border). 

Such projects have a serious impact on coastal fishing due to impairment of tidal exchanges and hence any cumulative EIA should also assess such coastal impacts. 

According to UNDP, fisheries are an important source of food security and livelihood for more than 14.5 million people in India. 
11.    All offshore drilling, trawling, deep sea mining and offshore wind energy has been exempted from Public Consultation beyond 12 Nautical milesThe exclusive economic zone(EEZ) of India is up to 200 Nautical miles. We say NO TO any oil drilling, deep-sea exploration, and trawling without public consultation.  Offshore wind energy needs EIA as a compulsory pre-requisite. 

Disturbances to the ocean ecosystems and/or accidents like oil spills can have wide-ranging impacts on the lives of India’s large coastal population of 60 million including fishermen and farmers, most of whom are poor.
12.    S16(1) Expansion Criteria: Any Cat A, B1 industries that are already large in capacity can expand up to 50% of their current capacity without public consultation.

Expansion does not require Environment Clearance: All expansion proposals of existing projects having earlier Prior Environment Clearance get ToR issued within 7 days without referring to the EAC.
We say NO TO expansion in the capacity of all red and orange category industries without the public consultation process. 

Ensure all explanation projects have prior EC.  LG Polymers in Vizag is a recent example of capacity increase without EAC approval.
13.    Dilution of S3(30) : General conditions have been significantly diluted to reduce the distance from the boundaries of protected areas, eco sensitive areas, borders and critically polluted areasRetain General Conditions in its original form.  

This is the most destructive amendment proposed in the EIA 2020 as it opens up large areas for potential red and orange industries. 

No Public hearing must be an extreme condition that is substantiated.  

We say NO TO reduction in General Conditions from 10 km to 5 km for all industries from the boundary of PA, ESA, and within ESZ. Retain 10Km as per EIA 2006. 

This will have severe impacts on ecology and in turn adversely affect the provision of ecosystem services like disaster control and water security which are far more major concerns today than industrial activity. Recent floods and landslides in Kerala and Karnataka are examples. 

We say NO TO any industry within Eco-Sensitive Zones. The activities permitted or restricted or banned within Eco-Sensitive Zones to be strictly adhered to.
14.   S16(1) has changed the definition of modernization to include aspects that are not in consonance with the accepted definition of process or plant modernization. 

It is to be noted that the amendment providing for capacity expansion up to 50% not requiring public consultation is retrograde in law ( (Niti Shankar Deshpande Vs UoI). 

This is all the more relevant as population density is increasing rapidly in all our towns and cities and an enterprise considered small now will not be safe 5 years thereafter.
Retain the original definition.  

We say NO TO modernization and expansion of capacity, irrespective of the percentage of expansion, without the EIA process of Scoping, EMP, Public Consultation, and EAC approval. 

The increase in population density warrants tightening the threshold across all categories.  
15.    Item(43) of Schedule allows >1,50,000 sq. mtrs. of built-up area of elevated roads and flyovers are NOW allowed without Public Consultation inside National Parks and Wildlife SanctuariesWe say NO TO any concrete structures that are detrimental to the health of forest ecosystems inside a reserved forest, National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries without Public Consultation and EAC. This is a non-forest activity and is against Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act 1980. 

Such elevated roads are ecologically unsound as they lead to high damage to forests during construction phases and lead to severe air, noise, and environmental pollution due to heavy traffic. The wider highways will impact arboreal and nocturnal mammals that depend on contiguous canopies for gene pool exchange. Hence these landscapes shall be devoid of roads that are wider than 15 m. 

Apart from this, the large resource requirement to build these infrastructures would also mean blasting nearby fragile hills for construction material.
16.    S19 has diluted the validity period of Mining from 30 years to 50 Years.Decrease validity period of all Category A mines to 20 Years and all other mines to 5 Years. Ensure cumulative impact assessment across the years of operation as criteria for renewal of EC.
17.    S19 has diluted the validity period of river valley projects from 10 Years to 15 Years.Decrease validity period for river valley projects to 5 years.
18.    S 19 has diluted all projects EC to be valid for 10 years instead of 5 yearsWe say NO TO EC Validity of all red and orange category projects beyond 5 Years.
19.    S26 is a section included to explicitly bypass the EIA process for large Solar Parks, Industrial Estates and Defence projectsWe say NO TO red and orange category industries which have been mentioned in S26 without Public Consultation, Prior EP and EC.
20.    Addition of S26(4) that exempts customary extraction of sand and ordinary earth from sources situated in Gram Panchayat for personal use or community work in village from following EIA process.Delete S 26(4).

Despite the perception that sand mining for personal or community use has a low environmental impact, it is the cumulative impact that matters. In addition, practical monitoring of such extraction is impossible.
21.    S22 No role for citizens to take part in the cognisance of violationsCitizens MUST BE a part of the process of identification of violation.

EIA 2020 must include a process for registering a complaint by a citizen of India and reporting on the progress and outcome of the investigation in a time-bound manner.  Such a process must include the name/s of responsible officers of Government or quasi-Government bodies and the addresses and phone numbers of these agencies.
22.   S22(9) provides for pecuniary compensation for violation that has no correlation with the environmental and social losses incurred in violation of a Cat A or Cat B project. This contravenes S15 of the Environmental Protection Act.All environmental violations SHALL have criminal liability as per S15 of EPA.

We propose below areas to strengthen the EIA2006.

Sl No.EIA Draft 2020 Add Conditions for Strengthening: Citizens’ ASK
1.    Strengthen General Condition S3(30) by adding the following conditions to protect Environment:

1.   Landslide prone, seismic prone areas as per the zonation maps published by GSI shall not allow red and orange category industries.

2.   Hill Districts of Western Ghats

3.   Hill districts of Himalayas

4.   Hill district of Aravallis

5.   Reserved Forest, Community Forests, Sacred Groves

6.   Wild Animal corridors – Large mammals like Elephant, Tiger and arboreal and endangered species like LTM, Slender Loris

7.   Wetlands like paddy lands, myristica swamps, lakes, ponds, and other waterbodies

8.   River Catchments – Example Kodagu, Wayanad, Idukki, Shivamogga

9.   The high watermark of river

10.   River estuaries and delta regions

11.   Watershed areas of arid zones.

12.   UNESCO World Heritage Sites including biodiversity hotspots

13.   Ramsar Sites

14.   Critical ecosystems like Shola Grasslands and grasslands of Central India plateau

15.   Mangroves and other coastal ecosystems like turtle hatching sites
2.    Publish the current gaps in protecting environment as per EIA 2006 (excluding all the subsequent OMs)
3.    Conduct Cumulative assessment for ALL  industrial, mining, and service sector activity that operate in clusters such as industrial parks, technology parks, export processing zones, and so on.  Such an assessment should be made an annual process for the industrial clusters in the country as well as for critically polluted areas.
4.    Conduct Cumulative Environment Impact Assessment (CEIA) for all river valley projects in the country on an annual basis.  A fresh CEIA is necessary prior to the consideration of a new river valley project.
5.    EIA is funded by the project proponent and executed by their appointed consultant. This is a conflict of interest in the EIA process. EIA should henceforth be funded and executed by an independent arm of the Central Government that is only answerable to the citizens of the country.
6.    Under Section 12 (on Scoping), mandate a notice period for public consultation time of 120 days.  This is to enable

a)        Stakeholders to file necessary RTIs and receive responses (60 days)

b)      Prepare for the consultation ( 60 days)
7.    Marine life is equally important to protect the biodiversity of our country. Trawling industry shall come under the purview of EIA and cumulative EIA.  To safeguard livelihoods of traditional fishermen,  ensure there is public consultation process and carrying capacity study conducted by an independent, duly recognised and competent authority answerable only to the citizens of the country.
8.    Make carrying capacity study at district level a prerequisite for starting any industry and for approving through EAC.
9.    Create and ensure environmental parameters as the primary pre condition for capacity expansion and modernisation under Section 16.
10.    Ensure that a river catchment policy is prepared before allowing any new industries along that river.  Such a policy must be prepared for every river in the country by an independent, duly recognised and competent authority answerable only to the citizens of the country.
11.    Hill districts shall have separate guidelines for building codes and EAC process shall be followed for any building or township beyond 20,000 sqm.  Such EAC process should include seismological studies done in the area in the last 30 years, if such construction is proposed in the Himalayan region.  If not such study has been done, a suitable study needs to be done an independent, duly recognised and competent authority answerable only to the citizens of the country and the report considered in the final decision making.
12.    In line with the UNEP guidelines for EIA, public consultation should be held at every stage of the EIA process including the TOR stage.
13.    Add pecuniary liability as a percentage of the total project cost for not publishing documents in the Parivesh website within 7 Days of applying for the project. .kml files SHALL be uploaded for all maps to ensure public is aware of the exact location and extend of the project.
14.    Defence Projects CANNOT come up in the criteria within General conditions like Protected Area, ESZ, ESA etc.
15.    Ensure all operations are STOPPED if there is no valid EC. LG Polymers continued operation after the expiry of EC. Add a criterion for liability and compensation if operations are carried out during the approval process.
16.    Add proof of retirement for units as a strict criterion prior to applying for fresh expansions. Example is Neyveli blast.
17.    Add a condition for cumulative impact assessment of a cluster of Small and Medium industries operating along a river.  Such CEIA should be done every 5 years, with specific comparison to the earlier reports of environment quality, deterioration, corrective measures taken and detailed plans for the next five years.  
18.    Include Social impact assessment as a mandatory step in EIA process
19.    Add State and District disaster management authority as part of EAC.
20.    All industries including mining to stipulate EIA process for decommissioning. 
21.    Reports/minutes of meeting etc to be uploaded within 2 working days of finalisation on the MoEFCC website
22.    Include Closure plan and timeframe for projects including mining and other red category industries.
23.    Add penal provisions for operating without EC and EIA. Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act mandates penal provisions for non-compliance.  Hence, only levying pecuniary punishment contravenes this section
24.    There are 43 critically polluted industrial clusters in the country. It is now evident that, subsequent to EIA 2006, the level of pollution has only increased in these clusters.  Hence, any subsequent EIA notification should strengthen the legislation not weaken it.  Rationale for diluting thresholds from EIA 2006 need to be explained in detail, with clear logic for its efficacy in improving the country’s environment and compliance by industry.
25.    Baseline data is now prepared by consultants who are hired by project proponents. In all cases, the data provided does not reveal the truth on the ground and tends to show compliance with standards and legislation. Hence, this must be a report that MUST be prepared by a neutral agency not connected with the project proponent. Such a report MUST be peer-reviewed by two independent bodies that are from academia and their comments on the report must be treated on par with the agency that drafted the report.
26.    Baseline data must necessarily include monsoon data.
27.    Risk assessment SHALL be added in EIA. This shall be publicly made available prior to the public hearing providing information related to the kind of chemical pollutants that could be leaching through water and air. The public shall be allowed to make informed decisions.
28.    No change in the contents of the EIA submitted for public hearing shall be possible before publishing the final EIA. 
29.    Climate Change considerations must be duly incorporated into the EIA draft.
30.    Utilize underutilized pool of expertise within Government institutions such as CPCB, SPCB, BSI, ZSI, GSI WII, FRI, NIAW, SACON, IIFM, CGWB and such state agencies for post-project monitoring.

June 2020

35 thoughts on “Summary of Citizens’ response on EIA 2020 Draft

  1. Ram Kumar Reply

    We all need to stand up against environmental injustice. Thank you for making it easy.

  2. Pingback: More than 50 student and youth groups expressed solidarity against EIA notification2020 - Climate Post

  3. Pingback: Youth unions call for amendment of the draft EIA notification

  4. Sunil Sood Reply

    Any point on the qualifications, experience of the scientists, engineers and testing facilities available with those who prepare EIA and EMP reports? How do we ensure that they do an honest job and do not cook up the data? What are the steps recommended to ensure honest implementation of the EMP? What is the whole institutional structure available.

  5. Sunil Sood Reply

    Can we simply demand that the locations for De-growth be identified and no new projects shall be automatically allowed for such locations.

  6. Dr.UN Nandakumar Reply

    Howsoever perfect the utility of EIA and EMP is its effective implementation benefiting maintenance and strengthening of ecosystem integrity , social appeal economic viability and self sustainability. Unless there is abuilt in mechanism for every EIA and EMP to have these implemented continously monitored and with periodic course correction.

  7. Dr.UN Nandakumar Reply

    Howsoever perfect the utility of EIA and EMP is its effective implementation benefiting maintenance and strengthening of ecosystem integrity , social appeal economic viability and self sustainability. Unless there is abuilt in mechanism for every EIA and EMP to have these implemented continously monitored and with periodic course correction its utility will be very limited howsoever noble the goven project is ! So the first and foremost condition for every accepted project is to ensure this condition .

  8. Hariharan T S Reply

    The eia draft needs further public response to preserve environment. Appointing a committee and appraising the subject draft is a must. Any hasty attempt to pass this as per draft over looking the suggestion will entail social disharmony. Many are the damages suffered due to circumventing the provisions existing already, hence the act needs a thorough consideration to include recommendations suggested and more if any.

  9. Ramesh babu. M. V. Reply

    This is injustice to our early environmental laws. so withdraw this amendment.

  10. Aslam Muhyidheen Reply

    Sad to see that members of the parliament are not concerned about protecting the natural environment and the fate of this country depends upon the perseverance of common citizens.

  11. Mohamed fazil Reply

    Please extend the allowed time to vote the suggesions and objections on EIA 2020,

    • Pampa Roy Reply

      The draft is a detailed one and includes all thd environent related concerns which need to be taken into account while giving shape to development projects. We know why the people in Meghalaya have to walk miles for water. We know what has caused the landslides on the Himalayas and the flood covering Kedar Badri with mud. We know how rain pattern has changed. We need to learn our lesson and balance development and ecological inpact.

  12. Aarthi Reply

    Please make laws to increase the green cover and make the rivers and water bodies cleaner. Do not make it easier to disregard environmental impact of industrial processes and human actions

  13. Rajesh choudhary Reply

    Economic development of India is important. The developed countries should not exploit our natural resources for their benefit. Put a clause that NO pvt. Or govt. Owned co. Should be allowed to export our coal, minerals and ore for monetary benefits. they need to use for india’s development only.Then see how many cos. Will be interested to invest. Ecological balance n economic development needs delicate balance.

  14. Basavaraj Halager Reply

    We all need to stand up against environment injustice.

  15. Harish g mogaveera Reply

    We all need to stand up against environmental injustice

  16. AC Vinayaraj Reply

    Every citizen must oppose the move of union govt making cushioning to corporate people by diluting stringent laws. The move is unconstitutional and arbitrary

  17. Rama Sitaraman Reply

    The draft should also include Talabira, Hasdeo, Mollem, Dehing Patkai, Baghjan Oil Spill and other such areas in the Protective areas and ecologically sensitive areas. There should be heavy criminal liability for industries operating without getting Environmental Clearance and should be made accountable. A separate provision should be included in the EPA. Such industries should be made to compensate for any such violation of environmental laws.

  18. Madhukar Cholekar Bachulkar Reply

    Don’t implement EIA2020. It is against Environment and Biodiversity protection and Conservation. Don’t make any changes in EIA 2006.

  19. Geetha Reply

    Please also give feedback to bring in consideration of Life cycle assessment of product. Based on the life cycle assessment of product conditions & environment Responsibility of Manufacturer must be decided.

  20. Pingback: Youth unions call for amendment of the draft EIA notification - Poonit Rathore

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *