Why we must strengthen EIA 2006 and scrap the proposed EIA 2020

(With inputs from Dr.Claude Alvares, Goa Foundation)

Send in your responses to the Environment Ministry: https://bit.ly/313EoK8  

India’s ranking on the world’s Environmental Performance Index dropped to 177 out of 180 countries in 2018. We actually slipped 36 places in just a matter of 2 years (2016).

And yet, the Ministry for Environment, Forests & Climate Change (MOEF&CC), Government of India, has published (for objections from the public) a new draft Environment Impact Assessment Notification that is designed to further relax environmental standards in order to achieve “ease of doing business” for corporations and agencies who have shown till date a scant interest in the environmental impact of their activities. If the changes proposed are accepted, we will surely reach the bottom of the pit.

The Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification 2006 is issued under the provisions of the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The EPA itself came in response to the 1984 Bhopal disaster which severely impacted both environment and the human community: 10,000 people died; more than 2 lakhs remain medically affected till date.

Background of EIA

Till 1994, there was no requirement for any person or business putting up a project in any part of the country to get an environment clearance, or more correctly, a prior environment clearance before commencing development activity. In January 1994, the MOEF&CC issued the EIA 1994 notification, requiring all new industrial and developmental activities to do an EIA and get an environment clearance. This became possible because the EPA was passed by Parliament in 1986 enabling government to notify regulations to control, regulate, prevent and minimise the impacts of industrial and other activities on the natural environment and on local communities.

The 1994 EIA Notification was very simple. It comprised just 3 pages, together with 8 pages of forms and annexures – a total of 11 pages in all.  As a result of this notification, 32 kinds of industries from cement to thermal and nuclear power projects, etc., came under the requirement to get an environment impact assessment (EIA) done, and to obtain an environment clearance before the project could start.

The 1994 EIA Notification was very simple. It comprised just 3 pages, together with 8 pages of forms and annexures – a total of 11 pages in all.

The important thing to understand is that the 11-page 1994 EIA notification was simple, direct and easy to read and understand even by villagers, even though it was amended 13 times.  The 2006 notification had already become very complicated and required expert assistance, with more than 39 amendments and 250 office memorandums relating to its implementation. The 2020 notification is 80 pages and may require the assistance of PhDs.  It is not known whether this is being done on purpose. 

Most projects requiring environment clearance come up in village communities where the capacity to understand such complicated technical jargon – mostly in English – is limited. The EIA 2020 draft has been published only in English and Hindi without any regional language translation which makes a large population of this nation completely unaware of the implications of EIA 2020 on their lives and livelihoods. Except for one webinar that MoEF had conducted there was no interaction with the local self-governments or panchayats in diverse languages to make them understand the implications of the change in EIA2020 in comparison with EIA 2006.

On the other hand, those who are required to get an environment clearance can employ expert consultants to draft EIA reports. All EIA reports paint projects with rosy pictures, having with little or no environmental impact! Even if citizens make a serious effort to highlight their concerns and the deficiencies of such reports, ultimately the government goes ahead and grants ECs despite all objections!

Most EIA reports give baseline values of the assessment well within the permissible range. This makes every EIA report compliant with minor recommendations for a mitigation plan. Above all, the EIA reports are written by consultants hired and paid by project proponents!

Why then do citizens go through this process and what is the actual scheme of the EIA Notification, if it is to work for the community?

  1. The EIA Notification is issued under the EPA 1986 and any order granting ECs under the EIA Notification is an order issued under a statute.  Hence it has the force of law. Any violations of the EC order can be taken up before an appropriate authority for redressal.
  • The government has only recently set up procedures enabling authorities to take drastic steps like closure of industry, if EC conditions are violated.
  • Each EC contains a minimum of 50 environmental conditions, some specific to the project, some general (like 30% green cover) and it is obvious that in most cases these conditions will be violated.
  • In the case of mining, if the EC conditions are violated, this is to be understood as a violation of the Mines and Minerals Act itself, as per a recent Supreme Court ruling. As a result, the directors of the company holding the mining lease are liable to go to jail and also to pay back 100% of the value of minerals extracted by them. 
  • Thus the EIA process and the EC give the citizens a chance to ensure that such projects which have significant environment impact adhere to the standards and conditions given or face severe penalties. 

The government may not do anything if industries violate the environmental conditions – as the recent accidents in the span of one week – LG Polymer (Andhra Pradesh) Neyveli Lignite (Tamilnadu), Raigarh (Chattisgarh), Bagjan (Assam) have shown – but citizens at least have the right to move the court for reliefs. And the courts are bound to listen, as no court worth its salt can sit by and refuse to entertain complaints of violation of statutory laws.

EIA 2020 impacting lives and livelihoods

Massive landslides in Karnataka and Kerala claimed lives of scores of people in 2018 and 2019. These were triggered by unscientific road widening and illegal quarrying. The brunt of these events is borne by poor communities like lower economic-strata citizens, workers, farmers and fishermen. It is now globally established that the economic losses arising from these disasters is far greater than the short-term economic gains that may be targeted by loosening environmental controls. On the other hand, the gains that can be achieved by strengthening environmental controls can be significant in the form of better health of citizens, water security, better yields for farmers and fishermen, etc.

In spite of these disasters EIA 2020 draft if implemented would spell disaster to our environment and livelihoods. According to UNDP, fisheries are an important source of food security and livelihood for more than 14.5 million people in India. Food and water self-sufficiency in the rural represent a nation’s path towards “Aatmanirbhartha”.

India has lost over 1.6 million hectares of tree cover between 2001 and 2018, roughly four times the geographical area of Goa. The trend, unfortunately, continues. On April 7 alone, at least 30 proposals affecting 15 tiger reserves, sanctuaries, eco-sensitive zones, wildlife corridors and other forest areas were cleared or discussed over virtual meetings by NBWL and FAC. We all know our rivers originate from our forests. Loss of forests also means triggering deadly pandemics.

While it is desirable to have industrial growth and development, we have a responsibility to ensure that such development is ecologically viable and in the best interests of all stakeholders. After all the preamble to our constitution clearly states that the government is for the people. We interpret it as ‘for all the people’, in line with our Hon PM’s call, ‘sabka saath, sabka vikas’. 

We have reviewed the EIA 2020 Draft that was published in MoEF Parivesh site on 23rd Mar 2020. For reasons stated above, we strongly object to the dilutions that are suggested in the EIA 2020 Draft. We, as citizens submit our request to ensure Art 48 A and Art 51 (a)(g) of the Indian Constitution are complied with, and demand absolute protection of the diverse ecosystems of our nation. Apart from objecting to 22 dilution points of EIA, we propose over 30 points that need to be included to ensure EIA 2006 is strengthened for a better environmental health of our nation. We borrow our air and water from the next generation, our youth. 

There is no debate,

a) Development at the cost of ecology is suicidal

b) Without ecology, the economy does not stand a chance to survive!

Send in your responses to the Environment Ministry: https://bit.ly/313EoK8  

With Belief, Determination and Hope,

United Conservation Movement

21 thoughts on “Why we must strengthen EIA 2006 and scrap the proposed EIA 2020

  1. Praveen Reply

    Looking after the environment is as important as parents looking after the children .if we don’t then the future generation will suffer.we are aware and now need to be safe than sorry

  2. Rupa Reply

    When climate change is already a reality we have to seriously protect our forests , wildlife n the environment. Otherwise just basics in life like oxygen and water are going to disappear !

  3. Vijay Reply

    Due to man animals conflict 3Tigers are Shifts From Forest to Zoo in Nagpur Region one was dead in captivity ,its very horrible .

  4. CP Muthanna Reply

    Great effort by Team UCM and very well explained! There is an urgent need to highlight this in both the print and electronic media

  5. Suresh.D Reply

    Environmental protection is the practice of protecting the natural environment by individuals, organizations and governments. Its objectives are to conserve natural resources and the existing natural environment and, where possible, to repair damage and reverse trends.

  6. Shivaji Shirgire Reply

    When climate change is already a reality we have to seriously protect our forests , wildlife n the environment. Otherwise just basics in life like oxygen and water are going to disappear !
    We want change our life style also

  7. George Reply

    We have already grossly abused and degraded our environment in the name of progress. It’s high time to stop the abuse and protect it, nurture it for our own survival. As policy makers you need to open your eyes to see all the damage we have done to mother earth The abominal things we do to the earth in the name of development is not keeping with our Hindu culture and ethos. Wake up and protect and nurture our home, the EARTH

  8. Sunita Reply

    If we do not protect biodiversity we are leaving nothing for our future generations.

  9. Manjari Kishore Reply

    Wonderful effort. Climate change is already happening. We need the environment of Nature to steady our lifestyles. We need to have it all around us to for our internal and external peace. Nature is the answer to all our problems.

  10. Dilip Reply

    1. Including the importance of ecology in basic education and creating awareness about the same at grassroot level (schools, rural areas and the like)
    2. Make ecology a key corporate stakeholder (not just as an aspect of overall environment), so that it becomes a part of business governance policies in organisations.

    However, we need to make it widespread right away. The example I’m going to cite is regarding the proposed Hubli-Ankola railway line, which would involved the axing of more than 2 lac trees in the Western ghats (the planned route), thereby causing substantial biological damage. It has been played by the state govt, but the activists somehow managed to get a stay order from KA HC. So, we have reasons to oppose such activities and spread the good word to make the world a better place..

  11. Vanajaramprassd Reply

    Biodiversity loss is eating into the food security.for the small farmers especially
    We have to arrest this loss on the interest small and marginal farmers

  12. Vanaja Reply

    Biodiversity loss is impacting marginal and small farmers .
    Hencever have to take effort to conserve biodiversity ,underutilized plants which are

  13. Sonna Reply

    I agree that the earlier EIA should be the basis for assessing the impact of the project, perhaps with modifications to provide for sustainable economic activity.. there should not be a complete ban on projects or activities that provide livelihood and employment.. that is the purpose of doing an EIA..

  14. Pingback: Amend EIA Notification 2020, 'an embarrassment to country internationally': Students write to Environment Minister | | Citizen Matters

  15. Pingback: Amend EIA Notification 2020, ‘an embarrassment to country internationally’: Students write to Environment Minister | – Updated Review

  16. Shailendra Gupta Reply

    Saving the Forest and Wildlife is essential to save our lives.

  17. Pingback: ಮನುಕುಲದ ಮಾರಣಹೋಮಕ್ಕೆ ಮಹೂರ್ತ ನಿಗದಿಯಾಗಿದೆ; ಈಗಲಾದರೂ ಎಚ್ಚೆತ್ತುಕೊಳ್ಳಿ ಇಲ್ಲವೇ ನಮ್ಮ ಮುಂದಿನ ಪೀಳಿಗೆಗೆ

  18. Dhananjaya Reply

    It is unfortunate for us to request the people who are elected by very us; not to harm us!!!

    We have elected the government to manage the country;
    Not to
    Destroy the ecosystem.

Leave a Reply to Manjari Kishore Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *